In a world where content is king, it’s crucial to remember that context counts for everything, and audiences can be unforgiving – both of which make teamwork essential, writes Jason Dooris.
I don’t envy the brilliant people who work in creative. While we’re all working hard to keep up with the ever-changing media landscape, those poor creatives have a new platform – and therefore a whole new set of specs and methods – to get their heads around seemingly every other month.
And it’s one of the best reasons you should never start a campaign unless you’ve got media and creative together in a room, working things out as a team.
Let me paint a portrait
Just 10 years ago, the thought of shooting something – anything – in portrait was laughable.
Five years ago, due to the advent of the smartphone seeing billions of hours of portrait videos uploaded to the internet, there were countless blogs ranting about why you should never shoot in portrait.
Today, we’ve just learnt to accept it. People shoot and consume most videos on their phones, and flipping our phones to landscape is vaguely annoying, so we’ve just had to embrace video in portrait.
And that means creative have had to rethink how they shoot video. Is this content going to be seen on a site that’s largely accessed via desktop, and therefore it’s fine to be done in landscape, or is it for Snapchat, which basically means it has to be portrait to be relevant.
What if it’s for Facebook? If so, you’re going to need to put closed captioning on it because 85 per cent of their videos are viewed without sound.
Is it for YouTube? Then you need to give it the inverse pyramid treatment. You’ve got five seconds to get your message across because between 85 and 90 per cent of people (depending on which survey you read) hit ‘skip’ on pre-rolls.
That is barely scratching the surface. It can be easy to forget just how much there is for your creatives to be mindful of when they’re creating content for a range of platforms.
As for those of you who think it’s just that easy as recutting it for a variety of platforms, while that can occasionally work, more often than not it’s forcing a square peg into a round hole.
The content slayer
Perhaps the best example in recent times of someone deciding they could just rework what they had into a new format was 20th century Fox’s 2014 rerelease of Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
The iconic show was first released in 1997, and so was obviously shot in a 4:3 aspect ratio.
But when Fox brought out their remastered version, to be released on Bluray and Netflix, the world had moved to widescreen TVs.
“No biggie,” they figured, “we’ll just cut it to the 16:9 aspect that people have now.”
It did not go well.
There are two obvious ways to make 4:3 go into 16:9, the first being to trim the picture. But that led to as much of 25 per cent of the images being sacrificed, seeing a whole lot of heads and feet being chopped off (and not in the traditional, ‘Imma kill me some vampires’ way).
The other method was to use original footage which had been cropped. But the problem with that was these wider shots had been trimmed in the first place because you could see where the sets ended, or even crew members walking into the shot.
Fox didn’t seem to care and released these clearly inferior versions of their content.
But fans weren’t impressed, with some even creating a dedicated page called, ‘What’s Wrong with Buffy’s HD?’
The show’s creator, Joss Whedon, wasn’t happy about it either, saying “Adding space to the sides simply for the sake of trying to look more cinematic would betray the very exact mise-en-scène I was trying to create. I am a purist, and this is the purest way to watch Buffy. I have resisted the effort to letterbox Buffy from the start and always will, because that is not the show we shot."
(Typical creative – always so precious about their work, am I right?!)
Be kind to an unforgiving audience
Now, granted, this was a TV show with a global cult following, which made its way into the cultural zeitgeist, and the creative you’re putting out probably won’t have that kind of decades-long impact.
But that’s all the more reason to get it right.
Ads are the aspect of entertainment people put up with, because they understand that it’s ultimately what’s paying for the content they want to engage with. That means your audience are far less forgiving and therefore there’s very little room for error.
And it’s why it’s absolutely vital that creative and media work together from the get-go on all campaigns.
It’s not enough to simply say, “It’ll be digital” anymore – that might fly with a particularly naive client, but to your creative team; that could mean any number of platforms, all of which have completely different demands.
While they are challenging to be across, all these new platforms are also massively exciting – they provide us all with new boundaries to explore and push. But exploring works far better when you do it as a team.
Jason Dooris is the CEO of Atomic 212°. Check out Jason's other popular articles on My Business including Four things South Park can teach business owners and Ditching nine to five - could it really work?
Too many SMEs are making this mistake
By Adam Joy
Taking digitisation out of the ‘too hard’ basket for SMEs
By Jason Brouwers
The insanity of consumer expectations
By Jason Dooris