Concerns have been raised over plans to fast-track compulsory superannuation contributions to 12 per cent by 2025, with experts fearing the impact on both workers’ wages and business affordability.
Labor has promised to increase compulsory superannuation contributions from 9.5 per cent to 12 per cent by 2025, a move supported by the Coalition government.
Last week, the Grattan Institute said that such a move would cause an extra $20 billion to be stripped from workers’ wages each year.
Speaking to My Business sister publication Accountants Daily, CPA head of external affairs Paul Drum (pictured) acknowledged that there was a need to increase compulsory superannuation contributions, but the timing and speed of the increase was not viable in the current economic climate.
“There’s nothing magical about the 9.5 per cent number — we know that all adequacy test says that’s not going to provide people with enough retirement savings,” Mr Drum said.
“Our issue is whether this fast-tracking of SG to 12 per cent has been thought through properly because, if you take money out of people’s wallets today, consumption and investment suffer, and we’ve just had a zero inflation quarter — unprecedented in my working lifetime.
“We know that retail sales are down, we know that the property market has come off the boil quite significantly depending with town or region you are in, we’ve got low wage growth, low business confidence, and cost of living pressures.”
He continued: “Just because you force super up from 9.5 per cent to 12 per cent doesn’t mean they get a pay rise, it is taken out of what they get now. It doesn’t equate to a pay rise for everyone; in most cases, it will be taken from your current package.”
Further, Mr Drum said any increase that has to be borne by a business will place more pressure on owners who are struggling to keep their business afloat.
“While it is politically appealing in some quarters, it could be detrimental to economic growth, and conversely, if it does equate to a forced pay rise, over and above what a worker’s wage is now, who pays? Therefore, is it anti-jobs?” he said.
“These are concerns we are hearing from small business — who will pay if it is not already part of the package, because they can’t afford it.”
Adam Zuchetti is the editor of My Business, and has steered the publication’s editorial direction since early 2016.
- ‘Don’t assume how employees will react to redundancy’
By Simon Rountree
- Customers behaving badly: ‘My time is worth more than yours’
By Adam Zuchetti
- What businesses can learn from Sir Roger Bannister
By Adam Zuchetti