Recent high-profile allegations of sexual harassment have led a major accounting firm to issue a warning on the need to better understand and respect responsibilities in the workplace.
Since last year, there has been a groundswell of support for the #MeToo movement on social media, which aims in part to expose sexual harassment in the workplace, triggered by the landslide of sexual misconduct allegations against high-profile Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.
Speaking to My Business’ sister publication Accountants Daily, KPMG workplace and employment law director Elizabeth Ticehurst said that while sexual harassment in the workplace is not a new concern, the #MeToo campaign has pushed the issue into the forefront of people’s minds.
“Sexual harassment is nothing new in the employment law context; it’s been unlawful in Australia since 1984, with the Sex Discrimination Act, and even before that in the various states,” she said.
“But people are feeling more empowered to speak up about it than perhaps they used to be.
“There might be potentially a chance of complaints being made now where before, people might have stayed silent, or there may be more of a trend of women sharing stories with each other and coming forward as a group.”
Ms Ticehurst said businesses can’t escape from the reality that their employees might misbehave, and as such, must ensure they have the right policies in place to avoid being held liable to the actions of a rogue individual.
“Under the sex discrimination law, a company can be held liable for the actions of an employee, and that is usually what sexual harassment claims in Australia are about,” said Ms Ticehurst.
“You can tell people the behaviour that you expect, you can have all the right policies in place, you can have all the right things in their contract but you’re always going to have people who misbehave. People are people, these things will happen, it’s the risk of doing business, it’s the risk of having people work in your workplace, it’s often not able to be avoided.
“However, you are not automatically liable for the things that one of your employees does. There was a case in 2016 in the Northern Territory where a company was found to be not liable for sexual harassment committed by one of their employees because they did everything they could to prevent it.”
Ms Ticehurst added: “A lot of it is common sense, like having a policy that tells employees that this kind of behaviour is not acceptable. It’s things like training employees in the policy to make sure they are aware of it and haven’t just read it, but they know what is expected of them, and it’s also dealing with complaints appropriately.”
Further, Ms Ticehurst believes a draft whistleblowers bill introduced in October last year will “really shake things up” across all areas of the economy. As such, she is imploring businesses to examine and review their current policies.
“Until now, whistleblower protections have been there but they’ve been really piecemeal and they are quite limited in their application,” Ms Ticehurst said.
“The new whisteblowing protection bill, if it comes into force as it is, would make a big difference.
“The disclosures covered by it are significantly larger so it could cover just about any kind of misconduct or improper state of affairs in the workplace and in my view that would include workplace grievances that might not be a breach of any law, just a complaint against your manager or even complaints about bullying so a very wide scope of things that you could make a disclosure about and a wide scope of people that you can make a disclosure to.”
Analysis: The misnomer of bank regulation and loan costs
By Adam Zuchetti
Analysis: Bank ‘misconduct’ a woeful understatement
By Adam Zuchetti
Analysis: Banks wrongly targeted as business custodians
By Adam Zuchetti