logo
Receive the latest mybusiness news
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
Copyright © 2020 MOMENTUMMEDIA

3 questions you should ask yourself when reviewing employee candidates

Reporter
28 June 2021 3 minute readShare

With a majority of Aussie businesses looking to increase headcount over the next 12 months, there are three key considerations which can help with narrowing down the candidates, according to a local recruitment company.

According to new research from Robert Half, while many SMEs are headstrong on hiring more employees this year, past experience has hindered their long-term prospects.

The research found that 82 per cent of surveyed Australian business leaders have hired a candidate based on their potential who did not meet all the technical requirements for the role.

A further 46 per cent said the employee exceeded the potential of one who did hold all the technical requirements, 43 per cent stated they reached their full potential as fast as an employee who held all the technical requirements, and 2 per cent had a negative experience when hiring on potential and will not do it again.

“Some of the main reasons a company would hire a candidate on their potential include: to fill a vacant role at speed with the intention to develop skills internally; to expand the available talent pool for a hard-to-find skill set by considering candidates whose skill level is underdeveloped but relevant; to secure a candidate with a strong cultural alignment and developed soft skills; and to secure a candidate with adjacent skills to grow into an emerging technical field,” said Robert Half director Nicole Gorton.

“For many in-demand roles, the ‘perfect’ on-paper candidate is expensive, elusive, unavailable, or simply non-existent. The pace of digital transformation is evolving technical skills at an incredibly fast rate that is difficult for traditional qualifications to keep pace with, so evaluating candidates’ tech skills on tenure or formal accreditations alone is unsustainable. Not only that, excluding candidates who are a few years shy of the technical role requirement can eliminate a large section of strong candidates. By the same token, years of experience is not synonymous with excellence or past successes.

“Hiring a candidate on their potential is not a Plan B mechanism for recruiting in a talent-short market. It’s a cost and time-saving hiring strategy which, in many cases, has led to a more effective employee than hiring the technically skilled candidate who could potentially command a higher salary. A candidate being hired on potential may also bring a fresh perspective to the role, and with diversity of thought often comes results.”

According to Robert Half, there are three questions employers should ask themselves when evaluating candidates on potential:

1. Do their existing skills feed into what the role requires, and how quickly can they be trained on the missing skills?

“Hiring on potential doesn’t override the importance of technical expertise to a role. Employers should make a distinction between the ‘must-have’ and ‘nice-to-have’ competencies, overlaid with a timeline for when these skills are required. This supports them to assess candidates on whether their existing skills align with the ‘must-have’ or ‘urgent’ skills, as well as what investment will be required from the business to develop the ‘nice-to-have’ skills,” Robert Half said.

“Businesses should seek out candidates who have shown an appetite for development and possess a constant learning mindset who will embrace and apply professional training to their role at speed. Digital transformation will evolve every department and industry, so an appetite for knowledge will be a valuable mechanism in ‘future-proofing’ a team.”

2. Do they enrich and extend our team capabilities?

It continued: “A strong team is a sum of its parts, not a list of shared attributes. Businesses should assess what capabilities the candidate will introduce — based on prior professional experience or soft skills — and how it will complement or evolve the team.

“Soft skills such as communication and negotiation, teamwork, creative problem solving and adaptability are valuable assets, due to their role in influencing organisational stakeholders and making data-driven, strategic decisions. Experience in ‘adjacent’ technical skills provides a strong foundation to develop niche abilities while a demonstrated embrace of digital transformation to improve their efficiency, insights or results in a role suggests a ‘future-proofed’ mindset that can evolve at pace.”

3. Do they align with the company values?

“You can show someone how to use a program, but you can’t teach them to be a good cultural fit,” Robert Half said.

“Recruiting a technically skilled candidate who doesn’t align with the company style — for instance, someone who thrives in a structured and hierarchical corporate environment for an agile and autonomous start-up role — will just lead to dissatisfied, unmotivated employees who will be open to changing roles down the line.

“Hiring managers could use the interview to ask questions such as why the company message resonates with the candidate or their thoughts on the values a company represents.”

3 questions you should ask yourself when reviewing employee candidates
mybusiness logo
Reporter

Leave a Comment

Latest poll

How satisfied are you with the SME measures in the federal budget?