Mounting confusion on the tax classifications of certain businesses has seen an accounting firm call for SMEs to be able to elect one of two tax rates.
In the 2017 budget, the government amended the definition of a small business from businesses with an annual turnover of $2 million to up to $10 million, meaning businesses with turnover of up to $10 million should be taxed at the recently reduced small business tax rate of 27.5 per cent.
Meanwhile, the ATO recently sought to clarify the classification of passive investment companies, but there is still confusion over whether they are considered small business companies for the 27.5 per cent tax rate.
BDO national tax director Lance Cunningham told My Business’ sister publication Accountants Daily that confusion remains because while the ATO has already made its own interpretation of the legislation, it still has to wait for “further direction” from the government of its policy intention.
“Business needs clarity when preparing their 2017 tax returns and deciding whether to request amended assessments for the 2016 assessments for these passive investment companies,” he said.
“The Tax Office has already made its interpretation clear on its website that most passive investment companies will be carrying on business. Therefore, unless the ATO changes its interpretation to be in line with the government’s intended policy outcome, the government needs to [do one of three things].”
According to Mr Cunningham, the options are to go along with the ATO’s interpretation and accept the 27.5 per cent tax rate for passive investment companies, to change the law to clarify that passive investment companies are not taxed at the 27.5 per cent rate, or to change the law to allow small business companies to choose whether to apply the 27.5 per cent rate or the 30 per cent rate.
“This third option may actually be preferable for many small business companies, including those that are actively carrying on business, as they may prefer to be taxed at the 30 per cent tax rate,” Mr Cunningham said.
“The company tax rate reduction is causing a lot of problems for small business without any real tax advantage overall. This is because the company tax is really just a withholding tax, because when the company profits are paid out to resident shareholders as franked dividends, the tax cut for the company is usually clawed back in top up tax for the shareholder.”
He continued: “There is also the loss of franking credits that some companies suffer as a result of the lower tax rate.”
Another source of confusion has been the $20,000 instant asset write-off. As My Business recently reported, the specific wording of the legislation stipulates that deductions must be less than $20,000, meaning that invoices of exactly $20,000 are not eligible.
And as My Business reader Andrew of Brisbane pointed out, there is also doubt in the business community about whether that amount is inclusive of GST.
“So the Tax break is even less then if the Invoice itself needs to be $19,999.99. Once GST input credit is taken into account (which was always available in most cases), then the Tax deduction is for $18,181.80. So it’s not even $19,999.99,” he wrote in response to the original story.
“Unless of course is it possible to have a Tax Excluding Invoice for $19,999.99 plus GST qualify?”
Analysis: The misnomer of bank regulation and loan costs
By Adam Zuchetti
Analysis: Bank ‘misconduct’ a woeful understatement
By Adam Zuchetti
Analysis: Banks wrongly targeted as business custodians
By Adam Zuchetti